For this T-Shirt and others please go to http://www.TruePatriots.yolasite.com You'll be helping to support a true God fearing Patriotic Chaplain in his fight with the FEDs to re-secure our 2nd Amendment rights. Help him, since the Powers That Be have destoyed him financially. To understand his story is to know what the fight for freedom and Liberty is all about. More info can be found on this page (scroll down) where I interviewed Darren and placed the videos on You-Tube.
Former Hawaii elections clerk Tim Adams has now signed an affidavit swearing he was told by his supervisors in Hawaii that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Barack Obama Jr. in Hawaii and that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi'olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any record of Obama having been born in their medical facilities.
^ ^ ^ ^ Hook em' longhorns, kowabunga dude or Satanic hand sign? ^ ^ ^ ^
Rule of Law or just a piece of paper?
SO LET’S TAKE THEM BACK!
by Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III
(Jan. 22, 2011) — We need to restore the power of the people.
The big issue that we’ve discovered is a document of record over the course of a year’s investigation which wasn’t meant to be an investigation; it’s a year’s worth of exercising government. Actually, it’s more than that; it’s two years...
Cover letter for the formal (Process Server) 'serving' of the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA Sedition & Treason TRIAL Transcripts on Darrel Issa. (Plus new 12 page document for serving) http://www.riseupforamerica.com/ciaobamatrial.html Reasonable people ask reasonable questions. The enemies of freedom and our Republic continually refuse to respond. Common law, in the end, will prevail.
While we fight for Walt and LTC. Lakin, I thought it would be a good idea for you to see what's "behind the curtain".
This Bombshell PDF document below will show you how Congress was prepped for the onslaught of eligibility questions after the swearing in of BHO. This confirms that the Constitution is merely a rag to these Lawyers (Esq.'s) and states, among other things..,EVEN AN ANCHOR BABY CAN BECOME POTUS!!!!!
A congressional document that has been posted on the Internet confirms no one – not Congress, not the states and not election officials – bothered to check Barack Obama's eligibility to be president, and in fact, that status remains undocumented to this day...
Nov. 4, 2010 Now that you've called, now that you've voted, what has been accomplished? The calls go unanswered your vote is already forgotten and Mr. Fitzpatrick remains a political prisoner. This retired Lt. Cmdr. has little patience for the corruption in TN and in D.C. or for those who don't realize there is no more time left to PLAY and to BEG for justice. Some may question his timing. Some may wonder why he fired his original Atty. But none question his resolve. So what will it be folks. The RULE OF LAW or the current foreign and alien RULE OF MAN? Choose, as this hero has, your side.
Question: If the Constitution guarantees every citizen the right:
1.To be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures (4th Amendment), and;
2.To not have Warrants issued, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation (5th Amendment), and;
3.To have valid, just, and impartial Grand Jury deliberations before they can be charged with a capital crime (5th Amendment), and;
4.To not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law (5th Amendment), and;
5.To be confronted with the witnesses against them (6th Amendment), and;
6.To have the assistance of counsel for their defense (6th Amendment), and;
7.To not be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment (8th Amendment);
then how is it possible that the Judges and Jurors and elected congress-members and law enforcement personnel of Tennessee, all sworn to uphold and defend that very Constitution, can allow LTCDR Fitzpatrick to stand in shackles before them – WITHOUT A NAMED ACCUSER - after just denying him those Constitutional rights?
Answer: corruption!
Let me ask you another question:
Can we exist as a Constitutional Republic when the enumerated rights under that Constitution no longer exist?
Answer: NO!
And that includes the right to an Article II ‘Natural Born Citizen’ for the Office of President: one who is born on U.S. soil/jurisdiction to parents, both of whom are citizens of the U.S at the time of the birth!
Commander Fitzpatrick’s next ‘hearing’ is scheduled for Tuesday, 9 November, 2010 at the Monroe County courthouse in Madisonville, TN, ground zero for exposure of the nationwide corruption of the ‘judiciary’ and ‘law enforcement’.
Spread the word, notify the media, and attend if you can, so that this gross miscarriage of justice is exposed to the light of day.
Many of these cartoons are from my good friend Robert Hefner. You'll find his work all over the internet. I've used many on this site but have not given him the credit he deserves so Robert, thank you for all you do.
“The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!” –U.S. President Abraham Lincoln
A special thanks goes out o Mark McGrew for his great article in Pravda!
"..,
1. We the People, take to the streets and forcibly remove every anti-American politician and government employee and/or forcibly remove any politician or government employee that the People "perceive" to be anti-American. 2. The United States Military must do a "surgical strike" to permanently remove the correctly identified anti-American forces in government positions. 3. Foreign intervention of overwhelming force.There are no other options. All other options have been exhausted..,"
JAG HUNTER, (Ret) Lt. Cmdr. Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III sends: FAILURE TO REPAIR THE OUTLAW 2010 MONROE COUNTY GRAND JURY!
Counselor Pidgeon,
Jon Blackwood ruled Tuesday morning that Judge Amy Reedy's appointment of Gary Pettway and Angela Davis to the 2010 Monroe County Grand Jury effectively harmless error.
James Stutts argued the government's case. James Stutts is an assistant district attorney in Tennessee's 10th Judicial District. Stutts works for Counselor Steve Bebe, is the District Attorney General.
Even though infected by the outlawry of Amy Reedy in the assignment of Pettway and Davis to this year's Monroe County Grand Jury, Blackwood ruled the work product as it goes to the remainder of the 2010 Monroe County was recognized as good enough so as to render the 3 June 2010 Grand Jury presentment legally sufficient (the work of a de facto jury).
The Record is clear as of Tuesday, 5 October 2010 that the Monroe County Grand Jury is infected by the presence of--at least--Pettway and Davis. .
The government--in the persons of Blackwood, Bebe and Stutts--was placed under a duty on Tuesday to repair the de facto jury.
The government anticipates the need for urgent and immediate replacement of jurors rendered unqualified (illicit) in the jury process by the selection of alternative jurors!
Blackwood was under a lawful duty to order the Monroe County Grand Jury repaired as of Tuesday, 5 October 2010.
Bebe and Stutts were burdened under an identical duty to act on their own authority in the absence of an order from Blackwood's bench.
Gary Pettway stood as the Monroe County Grand Jury Foreman yesterday, 7 October 2010. James H. Stutts stood next to Pettway as the Grand Jury's district attorney advisor.
Jon Kerry Blackwood is now demonstrably criminally complicit in the outlaw operation of the 2010 Monroe County Grand Jury. Stutts and Bebe are further exposed as criminally complicit.
Note well: Jon Kerry Blackwood was burdened under a more expansive lawful duty on Tuesday. It was Blackwood's duty to declare every illicit Tennessee Grand Jury in need of immediate repair and rehabilitation ordering alternates to be called upon instantly (Blackwood comes from Roane County, Tennessee wherein one Mr. Snow has been a permanent member of the County Grand Jury for twenty-three consecutive years).
Blackwood must now be removed from the bench in the hearing of my case. Stutts must be removed as the state's prosecutor.
Blackwood's judgment of Tuesday 5 October 2010 is now fatally undone.
We must stop now going forward in state's bogus and disingenuous (bad faith) prosecution, and start going backwards.
The government's specific criminal intent as directed against myself is in plain view and is unarguable.
Fair winds, following seas,
/s/
Walt Fitzpatrick
Issues or findings of fact, not conclusions of law, are subject to collateral estoppel only in certain cases. The issue against which collateral estoppel is claimed must be identical to an issue already litigated in the earlier case and must have been fully litigated at that time. In addition, the court must have actually decided the issue. The decision on the issue must have been integral in the outcome of the original lawsuit. This last requirement assures the issue was vigorously litigated so that it is fair to prevent its relitigation in a second action because there is little likelihood that the results will be different the second time.
If an action has been settled by the agreement of the parties, most jurisdictions will not apply collateral estoppel, since the issues have not been fairly and fully litigated.
Darren Huff's story goes hand in hand with Lt. Cmdr. Fitzpatrick's saga. Here's his web site where you can get up to speed on the rest of the story from Madisonville, TN.
****************************************************************************************************** So here we have an individual who freely admits Soetoro was not born here (has no BC on file with HI) and is more than willing to throw the race card arround. Fitzpatrick and Lakin know this.., hell, everyone in DC knows this so what do you intend to do about it???? Hey Tim, read Article II Secition I Clause V and get real!!!!
1. A responsible journalist would not ask him to speculate or analyse on an issue as important as this. He should just be stating facts which can then be verified or not. 2. He is factually incorrect in calling it a certificate of live birth. He says it more than once. It is NOT. It is a certification of live birth. 3. His conclusions are worthless. 4. Playing the race card is unconscionable.
"WE THE PEOPLE"!!!
NOT ...
"YOU THE CONGRESS"!!!
HAVE SPOKEN!!!
FINALLY ... THE TRIAL OF THE EVIL Muslim COMMUNIST USURPER, barack hussein obama, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY ETC, HAS BECOME A REALITY!
This video is Dr. Manning's summarization of the New York City May 14-19, 2010 trial and verdict rendered by the court against the USURPER barack hussein obama.
FREEDOM IS NOT FREE! GOD BLESS AMERICA! GOD BLESS ISRAEL! Bob Pinkstaff Gunnery Sergeant United States Marine Corps Retired AMERICAN CITIZEN BY BIRTH, UNITED STATES MARINE BY CHOICE!
I was asked to evaluate both Pastor James Manning and the CIA Columbia trial.
I was at the first day of the trial during jury selection. Despite the fact that I believe that Zbigniew Brzezinski and the Sovereign Military Order of Malta should have been named as defendants herein, and that the Central Intelligence Agency is actually since its formation by Bill Donovan and those SMOM Knights in service of the Vatican to cover-up the Vatican role that created and controlled Hitler and the Knights of the Holy See SS must be properly called the Catholic Intelligence Agency; and especially now since the Knights of Malta including Casey, Tenant and now Leon Panetta, the SMOM control the CIA for foreign purposes against the people of the USA use Barry Soetoro accordingly are a RICO Enterprise,
I believe all should listen to the press conference held May 21, 2010 by Pastor James Manning:
As far as the verdict goes by a duly constituted jury in my estimation it should be implemented and the tenth amendment certification not to be questioned by any other judicial proceeding. Pastor Manning handled this matter in an even handled manner and he is to be respected for his restraint upon the need to have the arrest of Obama et al. placed upon the duly constituted authorities.
Were ANY of the Founding Fathers “natural born citizens” of the United States?
No… they were not. Not even one of the Founding Fathers was a “natural born citizen” of the United States of America, even though some of them had indeed been (native) born on what would become U.S. soil.
None of them were “natural born citizens” because all of the Founding Fathers were born prior to the existence of the United States of America. No one could be the “natural born citizen” of a nation that did not yet exist.
America declared its independent status as a sovereign nation on July 4, 1776, breaking away from England and British rule. But the United States of America was not formed until September of 1787, with the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. The Founders had no choice but to exempt themselves from Article II—Section I—Clause V of the Constitution they wrote and ratified. But there would be no other exemptions or exceptions from that moment forward.
So, how could any of them become President of the United States?
The Founders made this possible with this portion of Article II—Section I—Clause V; - “or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution;”
They included a grandfather section in the clause pertaining to constitutional qualifications for the office of President, - A ONE-TIME exemption from the “natural born citizen” requirement for president.
They clearly separate themselves “citizens” from others who had to be “natural born citizens” in order to hold the office of president. Citizens, who were not “citizens” at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution, would forever after need to be “natural born citizens” to reside in the Oval Office.
Excluding citizens at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution, who shall be eligible for the office of president?
“No person except a natural born Citizen”
We know why they had no choice but to exempt themselves, but why did they exempt only themselves? What was so important about “natural born citizen” status that they made it possible for only a “natural born citizen” to hold the office of president after the adoption of the constitution?
What did the Founders mean by the term “natural born citizen?”
As with all written laws or contracts, they are a collection of carefully chosen written words of known specific meaning or definition. Any time you study documents, you must use definitions of words as they existed at the time the document was written, as words occasionally change definition over time. In the case of a document as important as the U.S. Constitution, it is vital that we have the proper meaning or definition of those words at the time of the writing and ratification of the document, in order to properly interpret the document.
I am using Webster’s 1828 First Edition Dictionary to define the written words, as it is the closest I have access to for the era 1776-1787.
The word BORN is defined by this dictionary as—“To be born, is to be produced or brought into life”
This word is simple enough and few people want to debate what the word means.
The word Citizen is defined by the 1828 Dictionary as—“The native of a city, or an inhabitant who enjoys the freedom and privileges of the city in which he resides; the freeman of a city, as distinguished from a foreigner, or one not entitled to its franchises.”
This word is also widely accepted and seldom debated. However, ONLY as it relates to the current resident of the White House, Barack Hussein Obama, there seems to be great confusion over the meaning of the word “natural,” as it relates to whether or not Barack Hussein Obama is constitutionally eligible to be president of the United States.
Yet the word NATURAL is no more complicated than the words born or citizen.
Clearly, due to the Founders grandfather clause, any “citizen” could hold the office of president at the time of the adoption of the constitution. But after that, “No person except a natural born Citizen” could hold the office of president, or vice president for that matter.
The word NATURAL is defined as follows, in the 1828 Webster’s dictionary—“Pertaining to nature; produced or effected by nature, or by the laws of growth, formation or motion impressed on bodies or beings by divine power. Thus we speak of the natural growth of animals or plants; the natural motion of a gravitating body; natural strength or disposition; the natural heat of the body; natural color; natural beauty. In this sense, natural is opposed to artificial or acquired.”
Natural (Pertaining to nature - In this sense, natural is opposed to artificial or acquired)
Born (To be born, is to be produced or brought into life)
Citizen (The native of a city, or an inhabitant who enjoys the freedom and privileges of the city in which he resides)
As these were likely the actual definitions in play at the time these words were drafted into the U.S. Constitution, this is most likely exactly what the Founding Fathers meant by these words.
In case you have the urge to challenge the 1828 definition of “natural,” the current definition of “natural” is essentially the same—“existing in or formed by nature (as opposed to artificial)”
As a quick aside, for those having trouble with Obama’s alleged birth place, it is only the term “NATIVE” which refers to place of birth.
Native—“Conferred by birth; as native rights and privilege - Pertaining to the place of birth; as native soil; native country; native graves - One born in any place is said to be a native of that place, whether country, city or town.”
Is Barack Hussein Obama a “Natural Born Citizen” of the United States?
Although NO authenticated evidence has been offered to support the claim, those who claim that Obama was born in Hawaii would be claiming only that Obama is a “native born citizen” of the United States. As “native born citizen” is NOT the requirement for president in the Constitution, this is an argument of no real consequence.
Being born in Hawaii would make Obama a “native born citizen,” but not necessarily a “natural born citizen” of the United States.
Even if we accept the notion that Obama was “native born” to Hawaii, which was a U.S. state at the time of Obama’s alleged birth in August 1961, we would only be accepting the notion that Obama is a “native born” citizen, not a “natural born citizen.”
If Article II—Section I said - “No person except a native born Citizen” shall hold the office of president, an authentic birth certificate from Hawaii would indeed solve the problem, although no such birth certificate has ever been offered by Obama. This terminology would have qualified some of the Founders as well, without the need for a grandfathered exemption.
However, “No person except a natural born Citizen”shall be eligible for the office of president.
As a result, a Hawaiian birth certificate would not be enough to qualify Barack Hussein Obama, II - as eligible for the office he currently holds. Something else would be required…something more.
Obama supporters shouldn’t feel unfairly singled out however, as without the grandfather clause, no Founding Father could have held the office of president either, and they were all white men. In fact, all white men would have to meet the exact same requirements as Obama today. Article II—Section I mentions nothing about color or race.
What is required to be a “natural born citizen?”
In a word, nature… as in, natural law, or as the 1828 Webster’s dictionary puts it—“Pertaining to nature; produced or effected by nature, or by the laws of growth, formation or motion impressed on bodies or beings by divine power.”
WOW!—“impressed on bodies or beings by divine power.”—“produced or effected by nature, or by the laws of growth”
In terms of “nature’s effect” on human beings, what we know is the reproductive system and time honored natural laws pertaining to “birthrights.”
Webster’s 1828 definition establishes birthright as—“Any right or privilege, to which a person is entitled by birth, such as an estate descendible by law to an heir, or civil liberty under a free constitution.”
Such as, a child inherits his/her father’s name automatically at birth, as well as heir to his fortune and his citizenship.
No man-made laws are needed. In every civilized nation on earth, the “natural born child” automatically inherits their father’s name and all other related birthrights upon birth, with no statute required.
If Barack Hussein Obama’s father had been a legal citizen of the U.S. at the time of Barack II birth, Barack II would enjoy not only his father’s name, but his citizenship in the United States as well, and no man-made law could block his birthright to status as a “natural born citizen” of the USA.
However, Obama’s father was at no time a citizen of the USA. He was at all known times in his life, a citizen of Kenya, which at the time was still under British rule.
Barack Hussein Obama II father was a legal citizen of Kenya. As the “natural born” son of Barack Hussein Obama I, Barack Obama II is the “natural born citizen” of Kenya, which is why his family, friends and the press referred to him as “Kenyan Born” all the way up until he decided to run for the office of president.
From that moment forward, Obama, his friends and the press has denied that he was a “natural born citizen” of Kenya, and claimed that he was a “natural born citizen” of Hawaii.
But here’s the problem—Even if Obama was born in Hawaii, a “native born” citizen of the United States (which has yet to be proven), he was still the “natural born citizen” of his father, and Kenya.
This would have made Barack Obama II a “dual citizen” of both the USA and Kenya.
And this is why the Natural Born Citizen clause exists in the U.S. Constitution.
Barack Hussein Obama is the poster-child for why the Founding Father’s placed Article II—Section I—Clause V in the U.S. Constitution.
Dual citizenship means dual or divided national loyalties. That’s why the qualification for the highest office in the land is “natural born citizen.” An individual with NO reason for dual or divided national loyalties…
As a standard-bearer for Essential Liberty, the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and the promotion of free enterprise, national defense and traditional American values, The Patriot Post has received calls from grassroots leaders across the nation to put forth a conservative manifesto -- a plan of action to restore the integrity of our Constitution. After great deliberation, today we are releasing The Patriot Declaration (see PatriotDeclaration.US), in order that we might rally around a uniform proclamation to restore Constitutional Rule of Law. As Benjamin Franklin said famously when signing the Declaration of Independence, "We must, indeed, all hang together, or most assuredly we will all hang separately." Who are "We" in support of this Patriot Declaration? Preamble We are American Patriots, defenders of First Principles and Essential Liberty. We are Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, Coast Guardsmen and public servants standing in harm's way at home and around the world, who are loyal, first and foremost, to our revered oath to support and defend our Constitution. We are grassroots leaders and local, state and national officeholders who, likewise, honor our sacred oath. We are moms, dads and other family members nurturing the next generation of young Patriots. We are farmers, craftsmen, tradesmen and industrial producers. We are small business owners, service providers and professionals in medicine and law. We are employees and employers. We are in ministry at home and missionaries abroad. We are students and professors at colleges and universities, often standing alone for what is good and right. We are consumers and taxpayers. We are voters. We are not defined by race, creed, ethnicity, religion, wealth, education or political affiliation, but by our devotion to our Creator, and the liberty He has entrusted to us, one and all. We are Patriot Sons and Daughters from all walks of life, heirs to the blessings of Liberty, bequeathed to us by our Patriot Forebears. Patriot Declaration We the People, blessed with the inheritance of Liberty paid for with the lives and fortunes of Patriots before us, hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, that to secure these Rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, and that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it. WHEREAS, our nation is at a critical historic juncture, where we must choose between Rule of Law and rule of men; and WHEREAS, our nation is confronting significant political threats to Liberty from within our borders and from enemies abroad; and WHEREAS, our national Constitution is the singular guidance for Rule of Law and the defense of liberty; and WHEREAS, our elected leaders have forsaken their oath to support and defend our Constitution, placing the future of American Liberty at great peril; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, We the People of these United States, in order to restore a more perfect Union, re-establish Justice, re-insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, pledge to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America, as established at great cost in lives and treasure by our Founders and defended by generations since, and commit to undertake the following actions to restore constitutional integrity and Rule of Law, or be subject to expulsion: FIRST, that constitutional authority be established for any national legislation entered before Congress, citing the specific authority enumerated in our Constitution empowering Congress to enact such legislation, thus ensuring that such legislation does not amend the plain language of our Constitution, which prescribes its own method for amendment in Article V, or be subject to a point of order; SECOND, that all legislation explicitly cite its compliance with the Tenth Amendment to our Bill of Rights, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," thus ensuring that the central government does not usurp the powers reserved to the States or the People, or be subject to a point of order; THIRD, that all legislation and regulation imposed upon the nation apply equally to all members of the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of government; FOURTH, that fiscal responsibility be enumerated in our Constitution by way of a Balanced Budget Amendment, including zero base-line accounting principles, to be put before the states and the people; FIFTH, that said Balanced Budget Amendment contain a provision requiring a three-fifths majority of votes by members of Congress to raise direct or indirect taxes, and acknowledgment that the legislature has no authority to raise taxes for purposes that are not expressly authorized by the Constitution; SIXTH, that said Balanced Budget Amendment contain a provision that direct taxes be levied at an equal ratio to all Americans, ensuring that the cost-burden of government is shared equally by all, and consistent with Article I, Section 9, which provides "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed" which would unduly single out individuals or minority groups for undue punishment; SEVENTH, that said Balanced Budget Amendment contain a provision that the withholding of taxes by an employer is the option of the taxpayer; EIGHTH, that said Balanced Budget Amendment acknowledge the interdependence of economic freedom and political freedom by provision that any bill before Congress must enumerate its implications against the exercise of free enterprise, or be subject to a point of order; NINTH, that a Legislature Accountability Amendment to establish term limits for all members of Congress, similar to that of the 22nd Amendment, Section 1, limiting terms for the Executive, be put before the states and the people; and, TENTH, that Rule of Law as established through the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God, entitles the People to unalienable Rights such as Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, and severely limits the government from any infringement upon those rights. THUS, be it known that for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
Signed Fellow Patriots, throughout history the burden of ensuring that the flame of liberty burns bright has fallen upon the shoulders of a few patriotic men and women. But as Founding Patriot Samuel Adams noted, "It does not take a majority to prevail ... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." Through this Declaration, we, the tireless minority, publicly deliver hope and inspiration to our countrymen and, indeed, the world, and we send a message to those who have forsaken their oaths to support and defend our Constitution, who have abandoned Rule of Law for selfish pursuits: Don't Tread on Us, or you will surely suffer the political consequences. Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis! Mark Alexander Publisher, PatriotPost.US
James Madison, our Constitution's primary author, wrote, "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined [and] will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation and foreign commerce." Madison continued, "If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare, the Government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one, subject to particular exceptions." To that point, Thomas Jefferson asserted: "[G]iving [Congress] a distinct and independent power to do any act they please which may be good for the Union, would render all the preceding and subsequent enumerations of power completely useless. It would reduce the whole [Constitution] to a single phrase, that of instituting a Congress with power to do whatever would be for the good of the United States; and as sole judges of the good or evil, it would be also a power to do whatever evil they please. Certainly, no such universal power was meant to be given them. [The Constitution] was intended to lace them up straightly within the enumerated powers and those without which, as means, these powers could not be carried into effect." As for the Slaughter Solution, Article 1 Section 7 of the U.S. Constitution stipulates, "Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, and that in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively."
Written by Jim Renn
Main stream media personality Herman Cain responds to Constitutionality of Obama's eligibility
"The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."
Thomas Jefferson
“When the people rise in masses in behalf of the Union and the liberties of their country, truly may it be said, “The gates of hell shall not prevail against them." - Abraham Lincoln
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it's natural manure.” — Thomas Jefferson
