|
Re: U.S. is a corporation?
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 7:58 PM, JcP <jcpes1@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> The current form of government has nothing to do with lawful government
> or governance of/by/for the people or the de jure union of several
> American states. Every aspect of the idea of government has been
> incorporated and operates as an implied resultant equity constructive
> TRUST and commercial franchise of the UNITED STATES, having no fixed or
> pre-determined rules to run by, because the organic rules operated without
> the United States-District of Columbia, within the United States of
> America, which is a diverse and distinctly different entity at law in
> commerce.
>
>
>
> This subject can be elaborated ad nauseam, but the gist is what you have
> already summarized and concluded. How can a corporate executive of a
> non-Constitutional entity be held accountable to his actions under a
> Constitutional standard, where there is no one in any aspect of the same
> CORPORATION that has authority to do so? Furthermore, the CORPORATION itself
> has no nexus to the Organic Constitution for the United States of America,
> where exist the only mechanisms and constructs for lawful government and
> protections of un/in-a-lien-able Rights under the Bill of Rights. The
> CORPORATION is itself an abomination.
>
>
>
> *BELOW IS INFORMATION FROM DUN AND BRADSTREET.... *
>
>
>
> *DUN & BRADSTREET listings of government units, offices, agencies, and
> instrumentalities. This is a cross-section so that there could be no doubt
> about the search results regarding the complete federalization or
> corporatization of the purported government. *
>
>
>
> *STATE, UNITED STATES DEPT OF *2201 C ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC
> https://smallbusiness.dnb.com/ePlatform/servlet/ProductSelection?dunsNumber=0&busName=STATE%252C%2520UNITED%2520STATES%2520DEPT%2520OF&storeId=10001&catalogId=70001&productId=0&address=2201%2520C%2520ST%2520NW&city=WASHINGTON&state=DC&zip=205200099&country=US
>
>
>
> *JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DEPT OF *950 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC
> https://smallbusiness.dnb.com/ePlatform/servlet/ProductSelection?dunsNumber=5&busName=JUSTICE%252C%2520UNITED%2520STATES%2520DEPT%2520OF&storeId=10001&catalogId=70001&productId=0&address=950%2520PENNSYLVANIA%2520AVE%2520NW&city=WASHINGTON&state=DC&zip=205300009&country=US
>
>
>
> *All* can be looked up at the above site:
>
>
>
> *HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF*
>
> *EDUCATION, UNITED STATES DEPT OF*
>
> *U S DEPT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES*
>
> **
>
>
>
> *THIS IS INTERESTING !!!! VERY INTERESTING !!!!*
>
> **
>
> *THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA LTD *280 GRAYS INN ROAD, LONDON, GB
>
> *UNITED STATES LTD *7 GRANARD BUSINESS CENTRE, LONDON, , GB
>
> *UNITED TASTES OF AMERICA LTD. *THE STABLES GLENLORA, LOCHWINNOCH, , GB
>
> *OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT*
>
> *EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT*
>
> *DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY*
>
> *DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA** GOVERNMENT*
>
> *TREASURY, UNITED STATES DEPT OF*
>
> *SUPREME COURT, UNITED STATES OF THE*
>
> *TAX COURT, UNITED STATES*
>
> *JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DEPT OF*
>
> *SENATE, UNITED STATES*
>
> *HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, UNITED STATES*
>
> *UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES*
>
> *STATE, UNITED STATES DEPT OF*
>
> *SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION*
>
> *ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES, BUREAU OF*
>
>
>
> The list goes on...and on...Lookem up yourself..*ALL ARE REGISTERED
> CORPORATIONS*
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Further
>
>
>
> On December 26, 1933, 49 Statute 3097, Treaty Series 881, Convention on
> Rights and Duties of States, CONGRESS replaced STATUTES with international
> law, placing all states under international law.
>
> On December 9, 1945, International Organization Immunities Act relinquished
> every public office of the United States to the United Nations.
>
> 22 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 92.12-92.31 FR Heading Foreign
> Relationship states that oath is required to take office.
>
> Title 8 USC 1481 states, once oath of office is taken citizenship is
> relinquished, thus the oath taker becomes a foreign entity, agency, or
> state. That means every public office is a foreign state, even all political
> subdivisions; i.e., every single court is considered a separate foreign
> entity.
>
>
>
> The term individual means (14 Amendment) citizen of the United States or
> resident alien, thereof. See Immigration Code for definition, which is the
> only place in US law that this term is defined. When anyone signs a Voter
> Registration or purchases a "firearms" from a Federal Firearms Dealer they
> declare under the penalty of perjury that they are a "United States
> citizen". "United States citizen" are Fourteenth Amendments citizen; that
> is, freedmen. In Faretta v California, 422 US 806, 850 (1975), the United
> States Supreme Court ruled that everyone has the right to make a FOOL of
> themselves.
>
>
>
> The term United States means the District of Columbia and it ten
> subdistrict or regions: 16 Statutes at Large 19, February 21, 1871. Read it
> and weep!
>
>
>
> Title 28 USC 3002 (15)(A) states that the United States is a Federal
> Corporation and not Government, State or Republic, which means the
> Judiciary Procedure are corporate rules. William Dickson v United States, 1
> Marsh 117, 181 (1811), Justice John Marshall explained that "The United
> States of America" was a corporation and all of the politicians were the
> officers of that corporation.
>
>
>
> Said corporation died when Congress adjourned sine die in November. Abraham
> set himself up as dictator in March of 1861. However, the present Federal
> chartered or corporate "United States" or "District of Columbia" and its ten
> sub-districts or regions was created February 21, 1871, 16 Statutes at Large
> 419. The Birth Certificate was created, February 21, 1921, exactly fifty
> years later to establish or create Federal children or proceeds of said
> corporation, which are sold daily on the New York Stock Exchange as chattel.
>
> Title 18 USC 3077(4) states, United States, when used in a geographical
> sense, includes Puerto Rico and all territories and possession of the United
> States. Note it states "Puerto Rico and all territories and possessions",
> sovereign states, if any exist, are not and cannot be geographically part of
> the Federal corporate United States, the "District of Criminals".
>
>
>
> United States as a Corporation:
> http://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm
>
>
> *
> http://theunjustmedia.com/Banking%20&%20Federal%20Reserve/The%20united%20states%20Of%20America%20%20is%20a%20corporation%20owned%20by%20foreign%20interests.htm
> *
>
>
>
> http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/htm...
>
> (15) "United States" means
>
> (A) a Federal corporation;
> (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United
> States; or
> (C) an instrumentality of the United States.
>
> Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security
> http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si199717.htm
> http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1997/1997...
>
> With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress creates a separate form
> of government for the District of Columbia, a ten mile square parcel of land
> (see, Acts of the Forty-first Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters
> 61 and 62). Act 1871 allows the "Corp US" to control the country in the
> place of the natural Government
> http://www.teamlaw.org/DCOA-1871.pdf
>
> http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/ava...
>
> An interesting issue:
>
> Back in the early 80s, research was conducted on ways to raise legal issues
> to challenge the Federal Reserve and one of the arguments developed asserted
> that *CONGRESS HAD UNLAWFULLY DELEGATED ITS LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY TO ISSUE
> OBLIGATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES TO THE FED*, a complicated issue.
> Cataloging was done concerning some of the state cases regarding this point,
> and these cases hold that a state legislature cannot connect state laws to
> another jurisdiction because to do so constitutes an unlawful delegation of
> legislative authority to that other jurisdiction. Some of the cases on this
> point appear below:
>
> Alabama: Clark & Murrell v. Port of Mobile, 67 Ala. 217 (1880); State v.
> Firemen's Fund Ins. Co., 223 Ala. 153, 134 So. 858 (1931); State v.
> Proetorians, 226 Ala. 259, 146 So. 411 (1933).
>
> Arkansas: Crowley v. Thornbrough, 226 Ark. 768, 294 S.W.2d 62 (1956);
> Cheney v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co., 394 S.W.2d 731 (Ark. 1965). The
> opposite was held in Curry v. State, 279 Ark. 153, 649 S.W.2d 833 (1983)(can
> connect with existing federal laws).
>
> Florida: Hutchins v. Mayo, 143 Fla. 707, 197 So. 495 (1940).
>
> Idaho: Idaho Sav. & Loan Assoc. v. Roden, 82 Idaho 128, 350 P.2d 225
> (1960). But compare State v. Kellogg, 98 Idaho 514, 568 P.2d 514 (1977).
>
> Kentucky: Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. Commonwealth, 133 Ky. 292,
> 117 S.W. 376 (1909); Young v. Willis, 305 Ky. 200, 203 SW 2d 5, 7-8 (1947);
> Dawson v. Hamilton, 314 S.W. 2d 532, 535-36 (Ky.App. 1958); Legislative
> Research Comm. V. Brown, 664 S.W.2d 907 (Ky. 1984).
>
> Louisiana: State v. Rodriguez, 379 So.2d 1084, 1087 (La. 1980)("The
> Louisiana legislature is not authorized to delegate its legislative power to
> a federal agency, nor to Congress)".
>
> Maine: State v. Intoxicating Liquors, 121 Me. 438, 117 A. 588 (1922).
>
> Massachusetts: Opinion of Justices, 239 Mass. 606, 133 N.E. 453 (1921).
>
> Minnesota: Wallace v. Comm. of Taxation, 184 N.W.2d 588 (Minn. 1971).
>
> Nebraska: Smithberger v. Banning, 129 Neb. 651, 262 N.W. 492 (1935).
>
> New York: Darweger v. Staats, 267 N.Y. 290, 196 N.E. 61 (1935).
>
> Ohio: State v. Emery, 55 Ohio St. 364, 45 N.E. 319 (1896); State v.
> Perrico, 66 Ohio Misc. 7, 419 N.E.2d 895 (1980).
>
> Pennsylvania: Holgate Bros. Co. v. Bashore, 331 Pa. 255, 200 A. 672 (1938).
>
>
> Utah: Utah League of Insured Savings Assoc's. v. State of Utah, 555 F.Supp.
> 664, 673-74 (D.Utah 1983): court indicated that Utah courts would follow
> this rule.
Randy Robinson
|