Truth does not come from America's Media or elected officials or even those charged with protecting us. It comes from abroad and from within the gut feeling of Conservative America. The Federal government was charged with protecting our borders and you refuse to do so. That's your job, not changing our form of government like your doing.
You know we know that you know. We know you took an Oath to defend the Constitution We know you refuse to uphold your official contract (Oath)
Just one question.., what do you plan on doing with America's righteous indignation concerning your failure to uphold that Oath. You have allowed a foreign and alien form of government to be installed yet continue to harass those who have called you on it. There is now and allways has been a remedy for this treason, this subversion, this sedition... Simply the return to our Representative Republic with it's charter, the Constitution. minus the traitors and yes, that would be you. Sleep well and get ready as your days are numbered. We know who you are and where you are.
Let me help you define "Foreign and Alien form of government" with this 1948 cartoon. Aperently, the written words mean little to you so maybe you'll relate to this.. There's pictures and everything (lol).
The Oath to Protect and Defend the Constitution = the answer
Sat May 8, 2010 19:25
24.18.222.106
Content being censored by Facebook, not allowed access to post at 'Keyboard Warrior Command Center,' not allowed to respond to Paul A. Drockton. And even updates are arriving to late to be of any use.
ALL ATTORNEY GENERALS , their Staff and Police
You took an Oath to Protect and Defend the US Constitution right? Have you picked up the Constitution lately and read the 7th Amendment? Or are you thinking that you are in a "Constitution free Zone" as per the so called (un)Patriot Act? Since when do you take an OATH or AFFIRMATION and then just say, Oh Well?
Does your word mean anything?
Are you just calling the persons who are trying to PROTECT ***YOUR*** RIGHTS names etc.? Are you keeping in mind that false accusations are SLANDER even if it comes from you? Or do you think you are above the US Constitution, Laws and so on?
In case you have not read or do not have the seventh Amendment available here is what is in the US CONSTITUTION:
Seventh Amendment (part of the BILL OF ***RIGHTS***) "In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law."
Yes, RIGHTS -- not privileges, a slave's master gives privileges. Freedom gives you RIGHTS.
Washington State is an example of defacto 1889 Constitution in other words, appears to be true but actually is NOT! Dejure mean to be REAL.
US Constitution: [points out that ALL state constitutions should be in agreement with the US Constitution or the state constitution is deemed unconstitutional]
US Constitution: Article III Section, 2. "The judicial Power shall extend to all cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution,"
Amendment VII "In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law."
In other words COMMON LAW COURTs were the original courts that founded this country.
1878 Washington State Constitution is considered by the Library of Congress the real dejure constitution of Washington State and it agrees with the US Constitution.
1878 Washington State Constitution: "Article XV Sec. 9 None but citizens of the United States, or aliens who have declared their intentions to become such, in accordance with the laws of congress shall be employed in or about any public office in the state, or in any state institution, or in any public work prosecuted by the state."
"Sec 14. The common law of England - applicable to our conditions and circumstances, and not repugnant to, or inconsistent with, the constitution of the United States, or the constitution or laws of this state - shall be in full force and the rules of decision in all courts in the state; but in the event of laws being passed conferring rights or impairing obligations growing out of or founded upon principles of the civil and not the common law, then the rules of the civil law may be resorted to for the purpose of interpretation and decision."
--------------------------
Article IV Judiciary 1889 volume 000.00 defacto WA State Constitution Section 6 JURISDICTION OF SUPERIOR COURTS. "Superior courts and district courts have concurrent jurisdiction in cases in equity [is this even lawful let alone Constitutional?]. The superior court shall have original jurisdiction in all cases [attempts to not allow Common Law Court; is NOT in agreement with the US Constitution] - at law which involve the title or possession of real property, or the legality of any tax import assessment, toll, or municipal fine, and in all other cases in which the demand or the value of the property - - -- -"
"The superior court shall also have original jurisdiction in all cases and of all proceedings in which jurisdiction shall not have been by law vested exclusively in some other court;[once again appears to deny the power of the Common Law Court as per the Seventh Amendment] and said court shall have the power of naturalization [the US Constitution gives the power of naturalization to Congress - US Constitution Article 1 Section 8 "The Congress shall have Power: ---To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,"] and to issue papers therefor."; Once again the 1889 Washington State defacto Constitution appears to be repeatedly in controversy with US Constitution.
-------------------------
The 1889 Washington State defacto Constitution was not, and has not been presented to Congress.
Not complying with the US Constitution would answer why the 1889 has never been presented in Washington DC and is NOT in the Library of Congress as being the actual Constitution for Washington State, it would not be in agreement with the US Constitution.
Now how many other States versions of their Constitutions lack compliance with the US Constitution? "Do you have a defacto or dejure Constitution?
US Constitution: Article VI last paragraph "The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution;"
Therefore if you PROTECT AND DEFEND the US Constitution, the 1889 Washington State and all other defacto constitutions are NULL AND VOID Go back to the REAL Dejure Constitution YOU took an Oath to 'PROTECT AND DEFEND' that does not mean, you do so, just when it is convenient. The time is NOW, protect the US Constitution NOW, or we who are watching will have even more proof of who is choosing to be TREASONOUS and who is not.
"The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."
Thomas Jefferson
“When the people rise in masses in behalf of the Union and the liberties of their country, truly may it be said, “The gates of hell shall not prevail against them." - Abraham Lincoln
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it's natural manure.” — Thomas Jefferson