Der Fuerher ... Reincarnated in America.

The new definition of transparency?

You mean we will find out that he is wheelchair bound, Michelle is a lesbian and he has a mistress?

Didn’t the AP task 11 reporters with the “fact checking” of Sarah Palin’s book?

.
What reporter would agree to such an odious arrangement.

“Just don’t ask anything that would paint us in a negative light...”

/end Anna-leader of the Visitors

they aren’t journalists. They are agents of the administration

http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2010/03/most-transparent-president-ever-has.html

“Most Transparent President Ever Has Bar Records Redacted This Week, Leaving Only Traces of His Existence Some Betamax Videos and a Fraternity Pin”

President Obama’s Occidental College transcripts have never been released. His Columbia transcripts are, likewise, AWOL. And his Harvard Law transcripts also haven’t been made public.

Finally, it’s reported, he never published any articles while at Harvard, yet somehow served as Editor of Law Review. That would make him unique among editors, according to insiders.

Even John “D Student” Kerry was guilt-tripped into releasing his transcripts.

Curiously, since I relayed a report of Obama’s “teaching career” at Chicago (he was apparently never a law professor, as some have claimed), the Illinois Bar has decided to partially redact what little public information it had available on its website related to the President’s legal status.

On March 1st, I captured the public records available at the Illinois Bar’s website for the President (click to zoom):

Perhaps it’s just some clerical issue or a database cleanup problem.

But when even the tiniest breadcrumbs of background information on this, the most mysterious President ever, begin disappearing, I think it’s worth asking some questions.

And perhaps The New York Times or Glutes Sullivan could reassign a cub reporter from the Sarah Palin detail in Wasilla to find out just what the President’s grades were — and how he actually paid for school.

The MSN

“In light of numbing revelations over the last several days concerning fraudulent statements on Barack Obama’s resume,”

Are there specifics now? Beside what we already knew?

.
What reporter would accept these odious terms?

Wacthing Mike Wallace interviews with Aldous Huxley, listening to anthony huchins during the START talks today proclaiming that based on the healthcare process Obama would be around in 2012 and beyond, and then this totally OUTRAGEOUS request to the PRESS and their capitulation, one would think we are well into a Dictatorship.

What reporter would accept these odious terms?

A better question: Reporter? Where?

In his memoirs Barry’s already admitted that he regularly snorted coke. His college records are tightly sealed. His only substantive job prior to politics was as a partner with Domestic Terrorist Bill Ayres in a foundation that doled out cash to dubious non-profits. This was all apparent before the election, yet was downplayed significantly in the press. I don’t know why it’s a surprise that there may be other surprises that journalists are keeping under their hats.

Bookmark. I watched his video linked on that page- very interesting.

WOW...This is just insane... Most days I don’t know if I want to Puke,Cry,Laugh, or all of the above. I can’t imagine the laughter/Outrage if President Bush has even tried to ask the media to not report a story.

The media has lost all credibility. No one should believe one word these people utter. I hope all the ratings for these people continues to plummet. Of course then Obama will probably just say they are too big to fail and bail them out...

Obviously, just about all of them.

This would be one odd instruction, first guess is Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dorn, et al, visit often

It will all come out after Obama's presidency in their books.

And then the reporter will say that proves he is a balanced journalist

I have long thought that most reporters, actors and politicians, doing nothing really useful, have sold their souls to lucifer in return for temporary success and to obstruct those of us who do not worship lucifer.

Oh... almost anyone who wants to work for the NYT, Washington Post or other flagship MSM media.

Journalist ethics have been so totally compromised in the years since the 70s that they might not even exist except in rare cases.

Journalists these days do not consider themselves impartial observers and reporters. They want to make things better, change the world, etc. If that means the truth suffers, it’s just part of the price that must be paid — as they see it.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2486635/posts?q=1&;page=51

Chicago Law Prof on Obama: “The Professors Hated Him because he was Lazy, Unqualified”

Are these reporters not smart enough to see what a great opportunity this is?

They could be the next Woodward/Bernstein.

bttt -

Seems there were a few recently that did something similar.

But it was with a different Hussein.

Who said what, what was said, who knows what and why for God’s sake don’t we know. Spit it out. I can’t take it anymore! This nightmare needs to end. NOW!

Unfortunately, nearly all of them.

Video clip from “V” - “Interview Moment”:

http://abc.go.com/watch/clip/v/SH011580430000/240996/240186

I think we keep thinking the MSM is somehow separate from this Obama Dictatorship. I feel they are very much part of the this regime and the rise of such. They are what Huxley was calling the “privlidged class”: They have all the “freedom” they want in this Dictatorial Government to investigate Obama’s opponenets (US Citizens) but lose their “freedom’ when they meddle outside of the rule of Obama.

Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, Zedung, Atilla and Khan (Genghis or Kublai, your choice) all rolled into one.

“What reporter would agree to such an odious arrangement.”

Oh let’s see, Jayson Blair, Mo-Mo, Kathleen Parker, Helen Thomas, just to name a few.

Sickening.

Revelations about what personal info he has under lock and key and no doubt armored guard hidden from Americans to see, especially including his school records from grade school through applications for college, grades and whatever he wrote under any of the names he may have used.

I actually think that finding out about this little arrangement to not disclose things discovered “in the near term” is exciting news. I think that should inspire the tabloids to get to work and dig up the dirt. Also, it will only take one resentful person who wants to settle a score to reveal what everyone else has kept hidden. Americans don’t keep secrets well when they feel they have been treated unjustly. Somebody’s going to feel slighted and start dishing.

Please explain this source. Is it credible? Never heard of them.

You're right....WE NEED NAMES !

Maybe. I bet they value their life a little bit more. The Chicago thug machine is on steroids now backed by a lot of money, our money, sadly. It's frustrating as h@ll!

ping!

Just remember... it was your friends and neighbors who elected Obama. He didn’t just show up... the idiots with whom you share a community elected him...

Not the same, but...didn't CNN wind up in hot water because they sacrificed truth in reporting for access to Saddam Hussein? Even letting a a few folks die rather than warn them of Saddam's intentions?

this has the same feel of the eve of Paula Jones & Drudge, when Clinton lied on the stand - my gut says this is going to break BIG

This is pretty common for the entertainment and sports media.

The Dems found out during the Clinton years that they could play this game. It used to be that no news org. would do this for fear of being ridiculed by their peers.

“Somebody’s going to feel slighted and start dishing.”

“Maybe. I bet they value their life a little bit more. “

You probably understand the risks much better than I, but the article says the journalists want to write books. That does sound like it delay the release of the information, but they can’t wait too long, or they risk that somebody else will get their book out first, and render the competing books redundant.

I actually heard O’Reilly or Hume or one of the Fox guys referring to this in the last couple days...they did not mention the Obama resume, just the angle about the WH asking media for ‘good stories’ in exchange for ‘access’.

Sounds straight-up crooked.

O’Reilly had a bit on tonight saying that the MSM has gone corrupt—i think prompted in part, by this revelation.

LOL! Yeah, we haven't seen the press cover up the failings of a Democratic president before, have we?

The only thing that surprises me is that they feel the need to ask.

The most recent was John Edwards...the media had to be brought in kicking and screaming on that one, and they still don't want to acknowledge that Elizabeth is a real shrew.

And take any Kennedy...Robert and JF passing Marylin Monroe back and forth. John's severe health problems were known by the press, but never reported. Robert's idea of comforting his brothers widow involved “sleepovers”. A lot of press knew, but being a democratic politician has press privileges.

As a previous poster alluded to, a lot of FDR's secrets were kept by the press.

They only become investigative journalists when the Prez has an R after his name.

Watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaWdcCzW5gc

I remember everyday...Funny enough the Obama stickers on cars have disappeared. And besides some black neighbors I can’t find one person who said they would re-elect barry....