Rise up for America

This came from the Natural Born Citizen blog today, 11/06/09.

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/hawaii-update-doh-confirms-they-maintain-a-birth-record-for-obama-dated-from-august-1961/#comment-15742

Brianroy Says:
November 5, 2009 at 5:38 PM

According to Kenya’s own embassy in Brussels, Kenya recognizes only the Kenyan Citizen father as having the exclusive right to pass on “Natural Born Citizenship”. And this would apply not only to Brussels, but with any country to which it does not hold a treaty with to say otherwise. From Kenya’s point of view, in its official document for public consumption…the nationality of the child must follow the nationality of the child’s FATHER, even if the mother were Kenyan.

http://www.kenyabrussels.com/docs/nationality_of_child_born_abroad.pdf

The US has no treaty with Kenya to say that Obama Sr. (Obama I) did NOT make Obama Jr. (Obama II) a “Kenyan Natural Born Citizen” at birth, regardless where Barack Obama II was born.

On 9-28-2005, at a Harvard University Q&A: US Supreme Court Justice Breyer described the Supreme Court’s role as “100 percent law interpretation” and “much more mechanical than you might think.” http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=508682

In the majority opinion of 2001’s Nguyen et al. v. INS http://supreme.justia.com/us/533/53/ ,
one of the criteria of proving one’s birth location and birth citizenship is through the 100% mechanical means of hospital records and witnesses.

533 US 53, NGUYEN ET AL. v. INS. (2001) @ 54 :“The mother’s relation is verifiable from the birth itself and is documented by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses to the birth.”
And @62:” In the case of the mother, the relation is verifiable from the birth itself. The mother’s status is documented in most instances by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses who attest to her having given birth.”

Supreme Court Law states that the disclosure of witnesses “TO THE BIRTH” must also demonstrate the veracity to the birth certificate or hospital records. A claim by the DoH health director is NOT legally sufficient under Nguyen.

Obama’s birth hospital or location was contradictory,
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103306

by Obama himself, by Obama’s sister, by Obama’s step-grandmother, by the Kenyan Media, by Obama’s fellow school mate whom he promoted into the White House.

Barack’s Kenyan grandmother insisted that Barack was born in Kenya, at Mombosa, and is therefore a son of her village and of the soil (of Kenya).
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=107524

6 African Media outlets have allegedly stated publicly to their readers http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=7449 that there is no doubt to them of the fact that then US Senator Barack Obama was born in Kenya.

The Nairobi Kenyan Eastern Standard is the primary one of concern.
http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm

As is Uganda’s media
http://allafrica.com/stories/200802180051.html

Barack once wrote:
“…but for me that only underscored my own uneasy status: a Westerner not entirely at home in the West, an African on his way to a land full of strangers.” Barack Obama, Dreams of My Father, Pg 301.

Barack, himself, labels “Barack Obama” as an “African” as if “African-born and Kenyan National”. There is nothing wrong with that, as we have many fine and law-abiding patriotic Africans who have legally naturalized to the USA…again, there is nothing wrong with being an “African-born and Kenyan National”, UNLESS you wish to attain the office of POTUS (President of the United States). The phrasing of “African”, and “not being entirely at home in the West” speaks NOT to home sickness only…but identity and allegiance.

Kenya’s Eastern Standard reported on Barack’s Father and used a photo from Senator Barack Obama’s visit in 2006 at:
http://www.eastandard.net/InsidePage.php?id=1143999351&catid=4&a=1

At: http://www.eastandard.net/InsidePage.php?id=1143998528&catid=556&a=1
The Weekly Standard reported: “Barack Obama Snr fathered six other sons and a daughter [besides Barack]. All but one live in Britain or the US.”

They also state that the offpring of Barack Sr., Barack “Obama sought refuge in Kenya 3 times in his life” and identified with the Black Muslim radical “Malcolm X” in his youth. http://www.eastandard.net/InsidePage.php?id=1143998681&catid=159&a=1

The Weekly Standard also reports that
http://www.eastandard.net/InsidePage.php?id=1143998528&catid=556&a=1

All Barack’s siblings, except for the one living in a Kenyan shack, are living in either Great Britain or the US. Obama’s step-mother Kezia Aoko, lives in Bracknell UK.

To date, Bracknell appears to be an undiscovered past in Barack’s layovers to London in 1987 and 1992. Has there been any depositions of the Bracknell family relations, and what they understand Barack’s citizen status to be…or is that not relevant as hearsay?

Clearly, Barack has siblings who are both British and Kenyan nationals, beside his sister Maya, who may or may not be a naturalized US Citizen…and who, by the way, is serving in the White House through nepotism.

The writers of the Nairobi’s News Media are convinced, along with momma Sara (Barack’s Step-grandmother) and the Kenyan Ambassador to the United States that Barack was born in Kenya, and is a jus soli jus sanguinis (native son birth on Kenyan soil) Natural Born Citizen of Kenya. They are upset that advantage over his — Barack Obama Jr.’s — birth site isn’t made for a tourist attraction.

On 03/11/2008, 10 month’s before Barack published his open letter to Kenya, the Weekly Standard lamented:
“On the road from Kisumu to Busia, there isn’t a single sign indicating the real hometown of Senator Obama. Yet billions of shillings are reportedly spent every year by bigwigs pretending to promote tourism!” http://www.eastandard.net/InsidePage.php?id=1143998423&catid=501&a=1

Mind you, we must remember, that Barack accepts the authenticity of this Nairobi Media, and in his open letter to Kenya, appearing in the 01/18/2009 issue
http://www.eastandard.net/InsidePage.php?id=1144004348&catid=4&a=1

He states perhaps an admission: “My own city of Chicago has been the home of some of the most corrupt local politics in American history, from patronage machines to questionable elections.”

Did Obama just admit to Nairobi and all of Kenya that the voting machines of Chicago were rigged? He also states in his “open letter” that he knew little to nothing about his father until his visit to Kenya in 1987. Obama claimed 1987 as his first trip, but strangely, Nairobi’s own Weekly Standard editor titled Obama’s letter as “The speech that ruffled government feathers.” Unless he told some lies they clearly knew to be lies, why would the Government of Kenya be “ruffled” or incensed by Barack’s letter? The Weekly Standard would not elaborate.

According to Nairobi Kenya’s Eastern Standard, Barack’s birth was not to a legally married couple…he is illegitimate:
http://www.eastandard.net/InsidePage.php?id=1143998542&catid=4&a=1

It was reported that Barack Sr. was not legally married to Ann Dunham in the US. “Before Obama Snr’s airlift to America, he was already married to his elder wife, Keziah. Ann Dunham, the mother of Sen. Barack Obama whom he met at college in Hawaii, was his second wife [or an illegal marriage in state of bigamy]. …Obama Snr returned to Kenya after his PhD at Harvard without Ann, but with another white woman, Ruth with whom he did not live with for long, either. Ruth remarried and still lives in Kenya.”

Hence, out of wedlock, a natural born citizen of Kenya, Barack Obama Jr. forsook Kenya as a backward country (if we are to believe the Weekly Standard of Nairobi which even Barack trusts), in order to lawlessly grab for the highest federal office in the USA.

Michelle Obama in July of 2008, publicly and specifically declared Obama as being born by a single parent. She could only source this knowledge in one person, from her husband, Barack.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114259

So was the Obama parents divorce Decree even a legal happening? We already know that page 11, perhaps a birth certificate, is missing.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18130289/Obama-1964-Divorce-Papers-13-Pages-Missing-Pg-11

But were they ever married? What is the legal background of Ann Dunham’s lawyer? Was he an American Communist Party or other radical party member? On what basis did he state in to the Court that Ann and Barack Sr. were legally married in February 1961? Were they wed on a fishing boat by a captain several miles out to sea?

The controversial Hawaiian newspaper announcement carried a fraudulent address, that belonging to an acquaintance of the family, an educator at the University of Hawaii. The Barack Sr. did not live at this address, nor is there any evidence that Ann lived there at anytime either.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=107337
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=104678

If the Obama’s never lived at the given address as man and wife, and it was merely the home of a friend at the University of Hawaii, then this constitutes a reasonable suspicion of fraud, and a right to a Freedom of Information Act release to the Courts and interested legal parties to review that information, just as the Media might also argue, does it not?

Where was Barack born? There are more than a few times he or a family member has changed his biography, and birth location.

On page 2 of the November 2004 Rainbow Edition School newspaper, Barack’s sister explicitly informed the reporter that: “Barack Obama was born on August 4, 1961 at the Queen’s Medical Center in Honolulu, Hawaii”
http://obamacrimes.com/103008Exhibit%20Charter%20Schools%20Rainbow%20Edition%20Newsletter.pdf

That was likely both the testimony of from her brother Barack, and more remotely possibly from their white grandmother.

By February 17, 2008, 4 years later, Maya told the reporter of the Star Bulletin that Barack was now born at Kapi’olani, an entirely different hospital 1.6 miles from Queen’s.
http://obamacrimes.com/103008Exhibit%20Star%20Bulletin%20Obama%20born%20in%20different%20hospital.pdf

Maya, it seems to me, was paid off with a political appointment in June of 2009

http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/06/obamas_half-sister_big_fund-ra.html

even though she was known as but having a teaching qualification only for “basket weaving”.
http://www.eastandard.net/InsidePage.php?id=1143998528&catid=556&a=1

Then we have an old friend of Barack, from high school days, who on Sunday, January 8, 2006, in “Duckworth working to win”, we find that Honolulu Advertiser staff writer Will Hoover reported:
“ Illinois Army National Guard Maj. L. Tammy Duckworth …is happy to point out that she and Hawai’i-raised Punahou graduate Obama have “a kama’aina connection.” Both were born outside the country — Obama in Indonesia, Duckworth in Thailand — and graduated from high school in Honolulu — Punahou and McKinley, respectively.”
http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2006/Jan/08/ln/FP601080334.html

Why would Barack have seemingly told Duckworth that he was born in Indonesia, and not just reared for a few years there? There is no repudiation to the birthplace claims of Barack as being foreign born, either from Senator Barack or Robert Gibbs; for Gibbs in 2006 was in the employ of Senator Barack in some form of a Press Information Control capacity, and accompanied Barack in his visit to Kenya in 2006. Notice that Duckworth’s Chicago location is “conveniently” about the same as Barack Obama’s.

Duckworth apparently knew Barack Obama since she was a teenager, and in her recovery in late 2005 to the first week of 2006, Barack would have been someone to visit her, motivate, and open the way for her to run for Congress, despite the loss of both her legs (if there is any truth to that “kama’aina connection” she claims). On Wednesday April 22, 2009, that “kama’aina connection” was confirmed in the Congressional records of the Senate Daily Digest in the Senate Confirmation of her on page D426.
“Nomination Confirmed: Senate confirmed the following nomination: Ladda Tammy Duckworth, of Illinois, to be an Assistant Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Public and Intergovernmental Affairs).”
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/crecord/digest2009/d22AP091.html

So if these are presented to the Court, how can the Court say that the query into Barack’s birth origins or Long Form Birth Certificate in accordance to 533 US 53 are frivolous?

On May 21, 2009 Obama solemnly declared before the US Constitution and Declaration of Independence, almost as if pledging after the manner of a legally binding utterance. Therefore, his words should be used against him in unsealing the Court records.

http://cspan.org/Watch/Media/2009/05/21/HP/A/18855/Pres+Obama+Speech+on+National+Security.aspx

1) “I ran for President promising transparency, and I meant what I said. That is why, whenever possible, we will make information available to the American people so that they can make informed judgments and hold us accountable.”
@ 37:10-37:23 on the C-Span video link

2) ]“…whenever we cannot release certain information to the public for valid national security reasons, I will insist that there is oversight of my actions – by Congress or by the courts.”
@ 37:54-38:07 on the C-Span link

3) “…in our system of checks and balances, someone must always watch over the watchers – especially when it comes to sensitive information.”
@ 38:28 – 38:39 on the C-span link

4) “I will never hide the truth because it is uncomfortable. I will deal with Congress and the courts as co-equal branches of government. I will tell the American people what I know and don’t know, and when I release something publicly or keep something secret, I will tell you why.” @ 40:44 – 41:01 on the C-span link

It’s time to take all the information, and submit it as a reasonable cause FOIA release of the Long Form BC, and other relevant papers or documentation (such as passports, US school and college transcripts regarding declared citizenship and financial status).

In District of Columbia v. Heller, the US Supreme Court, took to itself the task of offering a careful and detailed support as to interpreting a US Constitutional provision based on original intent and original public meaning. Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court in DC v. Heller, heavily documenting justifications toward an “originalist” view.
http://docs.justia.com/cases/supreme/slip/554/07-290/opinion.pdf

In June 2008, the then Illegal Candidate for President, Barack Obama, was quoted even by multiple lap-dog media sources stating that he was then supporting the DC v. Heller decision:

“I have always believed that the Second Amendment protects the right of individuals to bear arms…the Supreme Court has now endorsed that view… Today’s ruling, the first clear statement on this issue in 127 years, will provide much-needed guidance to local jurisdictions across the country. … We can work together to enact common-sense laws … Today’s decision reinforces that if we act responsibly, we can both protect the constitutional right to bear arms and keep our communities and our children safe.” For example, see:
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/06/26/1169956.aspx
http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2008/06/page/3/

In other words, a clear and distinctive legal analysis of a Constitutional Article is “much needed guidance” , even according to illegal “Candidate” Barack Obama. What his views are now, are expected to be in contrariness, as he fights through both Perkinscoie and the US Attorney’s Office to hold onto what he has gained by fraud, deceit, and felonious activities.

In Originalism: The Lesser Evil, Justice Antonin Scalia writes that despite a myriad of legal opinions given to the contrary of the “originalist” view, Scalia examines the historical context of a separate part of Article 2.1 of the Constitution than we discuss and debate upon, and examines why an original intent is the more proper view.
http://www.joink.com/homes/users/ninoville/lesserevil.asp

In the instance of the legal definition of who and what is a “natural born citizen” qualified to run for the Presidency, the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Roberts – – as in the example of DC v. Heller — can give an “Originalist” and long cited response to justify, once and for all, who and what a natural born citizen is.

Since Barack was all for Heller’s “first clear statement” and “much needed guidance” on another Amendment issue, why not also the same standard for Article 2.1.5. and the “natural Born Citizen” clause?.